RP: In 2013, a former fund manager called Victor Haghani delivered a TED talk entitled "Where are all the billionaires? And why should we care?"
Given the number of millionaires there were at the beginning of the 20th century, Haghani says there should be far more billionaires today.
After all, in that time, financial markets — particularly stock markets — have risen hugely.
VH: The basic thesis of it was saying that if investors were able to get the returns that they ought to get, then we should see a lot more billionaires in the world today than what we see. I’m not saying that it’s a good thing to have more billionaires, but the thought experiment was to show that investors must be getting a really poor share of the return that they should get, by the fact we have so few billionaires that exist today that should exist based on how many millionaires there were say, in 1900. So, it’s this thought experiment that is helping us to think about just how poorly investors have done in terms of capturing the returns that they ought to.
RP: So, why aren’t there more billionaires today? Victor Haghani puts it down to two main factors.
VH: The first one is frictions, is the cost of active management, transaction costs, inefficient investment in terms of taxation - so very heavy turnover that generates a lot of taxes every year, so frictions is one. The other one is really our own self-inflicted problems, the way that we manage the money ourselves.
RP: What sort of damage, then, are those two things causing to our investment returns? Well, using actively managed funds instead of low-cost index funds will typically cost you an extra 1.5 or 2% a year. But bad investor behaviour — particularly chasing performance — can be even more costly than that.
VH: A number of different researchers have analysed those numbers and what they generally look at is what’s called ‘investor returns’ and ‘fund returns’. They look at if you invested a dollar in a particular fund, what the return would have been if you had kept it in the whole time and that is called the ‘fund return’. They compare that to what they call ‘investor returns' which is where they look at the cash going in and out of each fund and look at the internal rate of return on that. Well, guess what, they find that 3% is very often the difference between the fund return and this investor return, which is huge.
RP: In conclusion, then, keep your costs low. But, even more importantly, manage your behaviour — preferably with the help of a financial adviser who understands you and what sort of person you are.
Don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel where you'll find acres of digestible investor education - no matter what you're investing for.
By subscribing, you can dip in and out and tailor your own learning programme.
Or get back to our Video Library to find more digestible content.